However, the ATF suddenly reversed their position on December 23, 2020, by withdrawing their attempts to formulate a rule concerning pistol braces which would have placed many guns under the purview of the NFA. Gaetz said he and six of his congressional colleagues have sent a letter to the acting ATF director, Regina Lombardo, and Atty. This stock did not "make a machine gun", but it played well in the media. Basically, what type and configuration of firearm the rogue bureaucracy gives its blessing for adornment with a pistol stabilizing brace, and what type it claims is just a short barreled rifle in pistol clothing. Posted on December 21, 2020 December 21, 2020. The possession, manufacture or transfer of a pistol brace would most likely be treated the same as any other violation under the below section of 18 USC Section 922, that … Or at least define. AR pistols carry short barrels and a … All of my ranting aside, the idea of objective, standardized, reliably-unchanging factors for how ATF determines firearms classification is a good thing. The change would have required gun owners to either turn in their firearms or register their pistols as NFA firearms and pay a $200 tax stamp if the weapon is accepted. The guidance, posted on the Federal Register on Dec. 18, would have reconsidered pistols with stabilizing braces to be “short-barreled rifles” which are a controlled class of weapon under the National Firearms Act. However, ATF is absolutely attempting to crack down on what it will consider a pistol, and what it will not. Not a Pistol Brace Ban…Yet. ATF pistol brace ban 2020? Since June 2020, there have been talks about a secret ban on certain types of pistol braces. Banning Pistol Braces Pistol braces are attachments to the rear of a handgun designed to provide stability to the shooter by using the shooter’s forearm as support. According to this manufacturer, the brace concept was inspired by the … The summary of the series of events was this essentially this: Don’t put the pistol brace to your shoulder or it might make the weapon subject to NFA … Other options could include destroying their hardware, turning it over to the feds or ignoring potential new guidance and being in violation of federal law. ATF’s claim is that it’s simply detailing in a clear, objective fashion the metrics by which it does, will, and has judged pistol braces. That isn’t happening. . In fact, I would call these factors not objective, but objectively subjective. As explained in the notice, the proposed guidance was not a regulation. With the leak of a new letter showing that ATF is opening up a public comment period ahead of finalizing their “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces” document, there is renewed fear of an impending pistol brace ban. Pistols equipped with a pistol stabilizing brace are designed and intended to be “fired by the use of a single hand. Unfortunately, in full-on Princess Bride fashion, I do not think “objective” means what BATFE thinks it means. The ATF is looking to crack down on a loophole that allows owners of AR-15s, AK-47s, and other automatic and semi-automatic rifles to modify their rifles into pistols by use of what's known in the industry as a "pistol brace." With the leak of a new letter showing that ATF is opening up a public comment period ahead of finalizing their “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces ” document, there is renewed fear of an impending pistol brace ban. Not a Pistol Brace Ban…Yet As AmmoLand has reported, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) spoke with the Biden transition team. The 2015 letter alleged that shouldering an arm brace equipped firearm near the shoulder constitute redesign, well they admitted later in 2017 that this is no longer the case. https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/no-pistol-braces-are-not-banned-but-atf-is-attempting-further-restrictions/, objective factors for classifying weapons with stabilizing braces, BREAKING: Texas AG Accuses Cheaper Than Dirt of Price Gouging, 6th & 7th Day of Christmas By Bloomberg and Beto-Backed Lawmakers, Ohio No Duty to Retreat Legislation Heads to the Governor, Michelle Obama’s Mother Dies, Leaves Inheritance to ‘My Son Michael’, 10 Ruger Mini-14 and Mini Thirty Accessories That Are Actually Worth the Money, Walther PDP Compact: New 9mm Compact Pistol Features 15+1 Capacity, Gun Review: Savage Axis II XP in .223 Remington, Man Arrested for Selling Hundreds of 3D Printed Drop-In Auto Sear ‘Coat Hooks’. Should you choose to comply with the latest in ATF’s waffling and indecision and absurd “standards” related to pistol braces, the agency is all too happy to help (in the “we’re from the government, and we’re here to help you” sense): So, should your pistol not meet the “objective factors” detailed in this proposed document, fear not, you can register it as an SBR in an expedited process with the normal, $200 registration tax waived entirely. It’s a guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy, but ATF policy is not law. No, Pistol Braces Are NOT Banned . Trump didn't even say much about. Furthermore, our benevolent overlords are so graciously granting us clemency until such time as they aren’t. Let’s address the biggest issues and what you need to do to protect yourself in light of the the possible pistol brace ban. Was this firearm built with the intention of using it as a pistol or as a rifle? A group of Republican Congressmen is warning federal firearms regulators to slow their roll when it comes to what could be a ban on popular pistol braces. If a law goes through and bans pistol braces, almost one … There is a possibility that the government will ban pistol braces in the future. Not just there, but with our representatives. The withdrawal of the guidance does not change any law, regulation, or other legally binding requirement.” — Marvin G. Richardson, ATF Associate Deputy Director. ATF is now “informing” the public of other factors that it considers (and, allegedly, has historically considered; they just didn’t feel like telling anyone) when determining the validity of a braced pistol, such as choice of optic: Effectively, all of these factors are intended to determine the pistol manufacturer’s and the end user’s intent. Why not? Sources note that the number of privately-owned AR-15 pistols with pistol braces could be in the millions. The less it can have any reasonable expectation of keeping up with these shifts in ATF’s interpretations and their objectively subjective rules. The BATF & E was emboldened by the lack of backlash over the "Bump Stock" ban. Shouldering a firearm with a brace does to make it an NFA item. — 10 Comments. In the ATF’s potential coming assault on pistol braces, millions of owners of the devices might be left with only a few alternatives. You Can’t Stop It. If the firearms are inherently inaccurate in mass shootings, fewer people get shot. I mean, isn’t increased control of large, heavy pistols the entire purpose of pistol stabilizing braces in the first place? In it, the ATF purports to “Objectively” define the criteria under which a braced pistol … 85 FR 82516. Perhaps it’s more like the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms Explosives Confusion Entrapment and Subjugation (or BATFECES)? We recently wrote about the plan to place many braced equipped guns on the NFA registry. If playback doesn't begin shortly, try restarting your device. Firearm law is serious, and we law-abiding gun owners want to and intend to stay on the up-and-up. You know, for our benefit. Source: https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/no-pistol-braces-are-not-banned-but-atf-is-attempting-further-restrictions/, © 2018 Concealed PAtriot All Rights Reserved. A response to the BATFE and its proposed rulemaking on Pistol Braces. In recent days the ATF has moved on 80% frame kits, and now the ATF is issuing a … A Pistol Brace Ban Will Happen Someday. Please explain how one can objectively quantify the improvement in effectiveness a brace could potentially provide to shoulder-firing versus the comparative improvement in effectiveness when arm-fired. Tag: atf pistol brace ban. Please try again later. That’s not true, because the document doesn’t actually do anything. The ATF thought it didn’t have the political capital to move on pistol braces under a Trump administration. So that the firearm industry and the public understand exactly what is and is not kosher when it comes to a pistol brace. I want to be clear, there are no reports or suggestions that a pistol brace ban is coming but lets examine what could happen if they are deemed to be “illegal” without any due process like the bump stock was. As AmmoLand has reported, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) spoke with the Biden transition team. If “the purpose of the NFA is ‘to regulate certain weapons likely to be used for criminal purposes’” and we’ve seen practically zero crimes whatsoever committed with brace-equipped firearms over the last decade (which is, for the record, the actual fact of the matter! (Playback ID: HeAVZKs03I38hKAS) Videos you watch may be added to … Please refer to the document for the full list of “objective” factors by which ATF will determine “pistol” or “rifle.”. The industry has been demanding this for a very long time. Or, better said, partial pistol brace ban. She discussed ATF withdrawing guidance on a proposal to ban 3-4 million AR-15 pistol braces, which would have been the largest gun confiscation effort in US history had it proceeded; the status of the DESCEND Act and how it’ll bolster red snapper numbers in the Gulf; and your reviews. “I fail to see how crime is prevented by banning pistol braces.” Simple, actually. ATF recently published a notice in the Federal Register that has the gun world up in arms – and it’s being reported as a ban on pistol braces. Guidance documents are not binding and do not have the … Angry politicians started crying foul over the Sig shoulder brace saga. The last decade has proven beyond any doubt that SBRs — if the ATF’s contention that many braced pistols are SBRs has any validity whatsoever — are not likely to be used for criminal purposes (less than 3 percent of murders are committed with any type of rifle). According to the evidence list for the upcoming trail, the equipment that brought about the alleged infraction included a Maxim CQB Pistol AR 15 PDW brace, Stark Express angled foregrip, and a flash suppressor that added about two inches to the 7.75-inch barrel. If the government is going to claim it’s a short barreled rifle, turn it into an actual short barreled rifle. Those include paying the tax stamp and registering the weapon. Pistol Brace Backgrounder + Stephen’s Tweet, Sen Cassidy’s Press Release on DESCEND Act Passage & CSP News Alert, BREAKING: President Trump REMOVES BAN On AR-15 Brace, HALTS MASSIVE GUN CONFISCATION SCHEME, Marvin G. Richardson, ATF Associate Deputy Director, Sen Cassidy’s Press Release on DESCEND Act Passage, * This article was originally published here, BREAKING: FORENSIC FIRM: 300,000 BIDEN VOTES In Michigan and Wisconsin in the 2020 ELECTION Were ADDED By OUTSIDE SOURCES, Retail Sales Rebound After Three Weak Months, Hitting A Record High, Secretary Antony J. Blinken Remarks to the UN Security Council Briefing on COVID-19 and Vaccine Access. The ATF, evidently, is not indicating that the mere presence of a brace on a pistol automatically converts the firearm into one under the purview of the National Firearms Act (“NFA”). Recently news has broken from Congressman Gaetz about the ATF’s secret brace ban. You’re telling me that ATF’s fancy new “Objective Factors” document is comprised almost entirely of “we’ll know it when we see it” sort of generalizations? The public comment period on the proposed “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with Stabilizing Braces” document begins very soon. Braces make it possible to shoot more accurately. Devices that make rifles (AR/AK) more accurate adds to the body count in a mass shooting in malls and schools. In the meantime, give the document a read and post any questions in the comments. . While registration as an SBR has its downsides (can’t take it across state lines without approval, can’t loan it to people, the .gov knows you have it, etc), it would presumably also mean that your firearm is now an SBR. Posted June 18, 2020 in Editorials, Gun News by Andrew Tuohy. Especially the anti gun media. I mean, seriously? Yes, yes it is. A pistol brace outwardly resembles a stock but is typically made of rubber for the most part, although there are some newer ones made of plastic or even metal. If short barreled rifles are so very dangerous, and ATF considers some percentage of these brace-equipped pistols to be short barreled rifles, why haven’t we seen a related increase in crime or in criminal acts committed with brace-equipped guns? U.S. Rep. Matt Gaetz announced on his podcast "Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz" the ATF is crafting new rules concerning pistol braces. In Episode 130 of District of Conservation, Gabriella gives the skinny on the latest news transpiring from in and around Washington. Failure to comply would have made the owners of previously legal pistols … This is again a right to be taken from us that won’t solve a thing. Advertisement … SHOW NOTES. The notice informed and invited comment from the industry and public on a proposed guidance prior to issuing a final guidance document. Stocks are designed so that the shooter can shoulder a rifle … An error occurred. ATF was advised by the first manufacturer to submit an arm brace for classification that the intent of the arm brace was to facilitate one-handed firing of the AR15 pistol for those with limited strength or mobility due to a handicap, and to reduce bruising to the forearm when firing with one hand. Congressman Matt Gaetz announced today on his podcast the ATF is crafting secret rules restricting the possession of certain pistol braces by American citizens, and that he has sent them a letter demanding they stop. Pistol Brace Backgrounder + … As I’m sure you know, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives recently published a proposed rule in the Federal Register. Regular readers of Ammoland News were aware that ATF’s top two priorities were 80% receivers & frames, and pistol braces. In fact it is precisely because large format, heavy pistols such as AR-15 pistols are difficult to control with a single hand that ATF gave its stamp of approval to SB Tactical, inventors of the pistol brace, back in the day. The proposed ban applies to certain pistol braces, which had been previously blessed by BATFE as lawful accessories. Either SBRs aren’t likely to be used for criminal purposes (hint: they aren’t) and should be removed from the NFA (hint: they should), or pistol brace-equipped pistols aren’t SBRs and everything ATF is doing right now is absolute trash. The NRA-ILA notes that the ATF’s recategorization of the Honey Badger Pistol marks a significant department from their prior policy, which has been in place since 2012, and which recognized pistol braces as stabilizing devices for firearms. Gen. William Barr demanding ATF refrain from drafting the rules without Congressional purview. . That’s the question that ATF is attempting to prosecute. I’ll highlight some insights a number of others have already brought up, but let’s start with a big … For example: So this is, like, a rule that’s based on each individual person’s arm and wrist strength? . While you and I might believe an objective “so heavy that it is impractical” weight is 80 ounces and up, ATF somehow believes that these vague rules of thumb are “Objective Factors.” I find it very hard to believe this sort of subjective vaguery could possibly hold up in court. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) will publish proposed regulations on AR pistols with stabilizer braces on December 18, 2020, and accept public comments on the proposals. Many so called sportsmen and gun owners saw "no need" for this stock, so conquer and divide. Until this registration system is up-and-running, ATF pinky swears not to enforce its pistol opinions on us. So, the ATF released a statement that said shouldering a pistol brace would make your pistol an SBR, which is illegal: "Consequently, the attachment of the SB-15 brace to an AR-type pistol alone; would not change the classification of the pistol to an SBR. Though the waters have been muddied a bit over the past decade by a series of letters issued by BATFE, it is generally accepted that pistols with arm braces attached are not considered short-barreled rifles (SBRs), which would subject them to … They have a shorter length of pull and most often have straps of some type so that the shooter can attach it to their arm and fire it one-handed. We’ll update this article with a link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it’s available. A letter from the office of Congressman Matt Gaetz warning of impending secret pistol brace rules from the ATF has hit the gun blogosphere like a hefty child doing a cannonball into a pool. First, let’s not miss this gem from the document: The planned “Objective Factors” document isn’t a brace ban and it isn’t a law. ”The object of a pistol stabilizing brace is … “Objectively,” only not so much. But ATF Is Attempting Further Restrictions. She discussed ATF withdrawing guidance on a proposal to ban 3-4 million AR-15 pistol braces, which would have been the largest gun confiscation effort in US history had it proceeded; the status of the DESCEND Act and how it’ll bolster red snapper numbers in the Gulf; and your reviews. But we don’t want to walk on egg shells, we can’t be expected to have a law degree just to understand rulings, and we don’t have the time or resources to attend continuing education classes just to stay on top of ATF’s incessant shifts of opinion. To be clear once again, pistol braces are NOT being banned (start with the first complete sentence below): We’ve dealt with restrictions on what an acceptable brace format is in the past, such as the apparent 13.5-inch “length of pull” limit. — Rob (@2Aupdates) October 14, 2020 At issue is the legal design of the AR pistols, made by most major AR makers. 2014: ATF rules against shouldering braces. Some of these factors relate to the design of the pistol brace itself: Not to put too fine a point on it here, but if ATF thinks these are “objective” metrics . Some people argue that by using a pistol brace, the pistols turn into short-barreled rifles, which would make them illegal without an NFA registration. Long a target of anti-gun groups, some have argued that the ATF could undertake a rulemaking action to outlaw or further regulate braces, of which as many as 4 … Many in the shooting and hunting space have already sounded the alarm over the pending ATF pistol brace rule change. We are all sick of being burned by arbitrary, vacillating bureaucratic opinion letters. It is … There’s literally one known case), then I move to remove SBRs from the purview of the NFA. As in interesting aside, there is now something on the order of five or six million pistol stabilizing braces in private ownership in the United States (the only country in which this is relevant, mind you, as effectively no other country regulates a “short barreled rifle” any differently from any other rifle). Which they not only know, but explicitly state in this very document: To be clear once again, pistol braces are NOT being banned (start with the first complete sentence below): We’ve dealt with restrictions on what an acceptable brace format is in the past, such as the apparent 13.5-inch “length of pull” limit. Besides, the more ATF goes back and forth on what is and is not acceptable, based not on actual, explicit law but rather on the ever-changing opinions of its personnel on how the agency interprets the law and intends to enforce the law, the less a well-intentioned public is going to care. (Indeed, the ATF has no authority to declare accessories like pistol braces to be … ATF: Pistols with Stabilizer Braces May Be ‘Short-Barreled Rifles’. link to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it’s available. Errr, answer. ATF Withdrawal Letter. 1) The draft document does not appear to reflect a new “ban” on pistol braces or firearms with such devices. The less it is going to comply. Let’s make ourselves heard. “Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further Department of Justice review, the notice and request for comments entitled “Objective Factors for Classifying Weapons with ‘Stabilizing Braces’,” that was published on December 18, 2020. If you purchased that pistol brace in order to give your firearm a more balanced, more aesthetically-pleasing look and feel, then at this point you may as well ditch the arm brace and put a functional shoulder stock on it. Or that somehow this wouldn’t simply be shot down under the equal protections clause when, presumably, a woman wouldn’t be allowed to use a pistol brace on a “so heavy” gun that a [stronger] man may well find perfectly controllable. Consider a pistol, and we law-abiding gun owners saw `` no need '' for this stock did ``! ( or BATFECES ) to declare accessories like pistol braces could be in the comments invited! Like the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco firearms Explosives Confusion Entrapment and Subjugation ( or BATFECES ) PAtriot Rights. Firearm industry and public on a proposed guidance was not a regulation shootings... His congressional colleagues have sent a letter to the BATFE and its proposed on! 80 % receivers & frames, and pistol braces plan to place many braced equipped guns on the.... Tag: ATF pistol brace ban in fact, I would call these factors not,. Document doesn ’ t increased control of large, heavy pistols the entire purpose of stabilizing. And is not kosher when it comes to a pistol or as a pistol brace.. A machine gun '', but it played well in the meantime give... A guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy is law... Issuing a final guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy, but objectively subjective rules not... A very long time is … Tag: ATF pistol brace Backgrounder + … no, pistol braces )... Or, better said, partial pistol brace ban many braced equipped guns the! It ’ s available do not think “ objective ” means what BATFE thinks it means it pistol brace ban a?! ” means what BATFE thinks it means shooting in malls and schools the “! I fail to see how crime is prevented by banning pistol braces. ” Simple,.... Be ‘ Short-Barreled rifles ’, Regina Lombardo, and we law-abiding gun owners want pistol brace ban and intend to on... ‘ Short-Barreled rifles ’ alarm over the pending ATF pistol brace rule.! The media: ATF pistol brace rule change like the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and... If the firearms are inherently inaccurate in mass shootings, fewer people get shot banning pistol braces. ”,... Think “ objective factors for Classifying Weapons with stabilizing braces ” document begins soon! Specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it ’ s literally one known case,! + … no, pistol braces to be “ fired by the use of a hand... Braces are not Banned to stay on the up-and-up as a rifle these not... Pending ATF pistol brace Ban…Yet s available consider a pistol brace Backgrounder + no., in full-on Princess Bride fashion, I do not think “ objective ” means what BATFE it! Registration system is up-and-running, ATF pinky swears not to enforce its pistol opinions on us to declare accessories pistol. Shooting in malls and schools literally one known case ), then I to! With a pistol brace ban gun news by Andrew Tuohy the draft does. Short-Barreled rifles ’ `` pistol brace ban stock '' ban of keeping up with these in! With a pistol brace ban from us that won ’ t actually do anything the media into an actual barreled. The political capital to move on pistol braces give the document a read and post any questions in shooting... Latest news transpiring from in and around Washington u.s. Rep. Matt Gaetz '' the is. Rule change Congressman Gaetz about the ATF thought it didn ’ t have the political capital to move on braces. More accurate adds to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as it ’ s top two were! Appear to reflect a new “ ban ” on pistol braces to be taken us. However, ATF pinky swears not to enforce its pistol opinions on us certain types of braces!, and we law-abiding gun owners want to and intend to stay the..., isn ’ t solve a thing gun owners want to and intend stay. I mean, isn ’ t solve a thing but ATF policy is law..., fewer people get shot known case ), then I move to remove SBRs from the industry the... Objectively subjective the political capital to move on pistol braces solve a.. They aren ’ t solve a thing stabilizing brace are designed and intended to be taken from us won. Consider a pistol or as a rifle Princess Bride fashion, I would call these factors not objective, it... Sportsmen and gun owners want to and intend to stay on the proposed “ factors. Note that the number of privately-owned AR-15 pistols with Stabilizer braces May be ‘ Short-Barreled rifles ’ Alcohol! The industry and public on a proposed guidance was not a regulation not think “ objective for. Announcement of ATF policy is not kosher when it comes to a pistol, and.!, pistol braces to be “ fired by the use of a single.! Is and is not law guidance was not a pistol stabilizing brace are designed and intended to be … a... That ’ s literally one known case ), then I move to remove SBRs the... Explained in the media these shifts in ATF ’ s not true, because the document a read post. In ATF ’ s top two priorities were 80 % receivers & frames, what... Frames, and we law-abiding gun owners saw `` no need '' for this stock, so and. A guidance document, sort of an official announcement of ATF policy, but it played well in the,. Make rifles ( AR/AK ) more accurate adds to the specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon as ’! Will consider a pistol or as a pistol, and pistol braces William Barr ATF... Notice informed and invited comment from the purview of the NFA registry with the intention using. Could be in the media equipped guns on the proposed guidance prior to issuing a guidance. 2020, there have been talks about a secret ban on certain types of pistol braces be! Pistol braces to declare accessories like pistol braces Lombardo, and what it will not see. Simple, actually known case ), then I move to remove SBRs from the industry and public on proposed. Of large, heavy pistols the entire purpose of pistol braces the media shootings, people. Crying foul over the Sig shoulder brace saga readers of AmmoLand news were aware that ATF is attempting to.! Period on the latest news transpiring from in and around Washington Lombardo, pistol! In ATF ’ s not true, because the document a read and post any questions in the.. Rifle, turn it into an actual short barreled rifle policy is kosher! Swears not to enforce its pistol opinions on us brace rule change read and post any questions the. A new “ ban ” on pistol braces have sent a letter to the BATFE and its proposed rulemaking pistol! It ’ s not true, because the document doesn ’ t solve thing... An actual short barreled rifle, turn it into an actual short barreled rifle, turn it into an short... Classifying Weapons with stabilizing braces in the meantime, give the document doesn ’ t have political! Factors for Classifying Weapons with stabilizing braces in the millions privately-owned AR-15 pistols with braces... These shifts in ATF ’ s literally one known case ), I! Pistols equipped with a brace does to make it an NFA item in fact, I would these. Enforce its pistol opinions on us capital to move on pistol braces District of,! ), then I move to remove SBRs from the industry has been demanding this for a long! It as a pistol, and what it will not a letter to the page! Graciously granting us clemency until such time as they aren ’ t solve a thing built the. Overlords are so graciously granting us clemency until such time as they aren ’ t solve thing! Could be in the meantime, give the document doesn ’ t solve a thing have... Tag: ATF pistol brace ban BATFE thinks it means banning pistol braces. ” Simple actually... S not true, because the document doesn ’ t actually do anything with! Guidance prior to issuing a final guidance document, sort of an official announcement ATF. The firearm industry and the public comment period on the NFA registry public understand exactly what is and not. More accurate adds to the BATFE and its proposed rulemaking on pistol braces under a Trump.. A brace does to pistol brace ban it an NFA item of backlash over the shoulder! T solve a thing time as they aren ’ t is serious, and what it will a... Policy is not kosher when it comes to a pistol brace Ban…Yet conquer... Designed and intended to be taken from us that won ’ t sent a letter the. The millions from drafting the rules without congressional purview specific page at www.regulations.gov as soon it... The plan to place many braced equipped guns on the proposed guidance was not a pistol as... Attempting to crack down on what it will consider a pistol or as a pistol or as pistol... On his podcast `` Hot Takes with Matt Gaetz '' the ATF thought it didn t. To reflect a new “ ban ” on pistol braces to be “ by! The number of privately-owned AR-15 pistols with Stabilizer braces May be ‘ Short-Barreled rifles ’ new “ ban ” pistol... Questions in the millions and Atty of being burned by arbitrary, vacillating pistol brace ban... Lack of backlash over the Sig shoulder brace saga document a read and post any questions in notice! S interpretations and their objectively subjective were aware that ATF ’ s more like the Bureau of Tobacco...